Some NFL teams, like the and , are entering the 2020 season.Many of those same teams are also loaded with offseason needs, meaning they'll have reason to spend up in free agency.But what about the clubs hurting for cap space? What about those who might actually have to make moves in order to make more? The NFL is famously a league of parity, but one look at teams' makes clear that some are, in fact, much better positioned than others in terms of financial flexibility. Consider, for example, that the Dolphins own more than $90 million in available cap space, whereas the -- the worst team in terms of cap space -- are $12 million over the cap, meaning they're roughly $112 million behind the Dolphins in terms of available money.In advance of 2020 free agency, here's a look at the 10 teams with the least amount of salary cap space, per Spotrac's estimations, as well as some potential ways for the teams to free up money:10. Projected salary cap space: $23.3MThe Rams don't really need to do much chopping to be competitive this offseason, but if they're able to find a taker for a trade of RB , they'd likely save at least $4.65 million in 2020, in addition to at least $27 million over the following three years. Gurley obviously helped L.A. turn it on when given carries late in 2019, but his long-term role remains unclear, and he just so happens to play a position that doesn't tend to age well. The Rams could also save almost $5 million in 2020 if they were to release WR -- something that seems increasingly unlikely in the Charles Omenihu Jersey wake of ' injury-riddled 2019 campaign.9. Projected salary cap space: $22MGreen Bay doesn't nece sarily need to dump salary to be active in free agency, but TE seems like an inevitable cap casualty with an $11.6 million hit in 2020. The Packers can save roughly $8 million of that by cutting the under-performing receiver. Outside of a major and unexpected shakeup along the offensive line, there aren't many other ways for Green Bay to save a big chunk of money, though plenty of reserves could be released in order to give the team a little more financial flexibility.8. Projected salary cap space: $19.6MThe Niners have no shortage of options to free up space and spend big in an attempt to defend their NFC title. After giving up high draft capital for pa s rusher , it's unlikely San Francisco will part with the former end, but the team can save more than $9 million by cutting him and leaning more on . They could also recoup about $4 million by saying farewell to former first-rounder at the same position. Axing RB seems like a real po sibility following postseason emergence, considering his release would save San Francisco $4.5 million in 2020. Oh, and just in case you're wondering, the Niners aren't moving on from QB weeks after he started in the Super Bowl, but if they were to cut the signal-caller and try to upgrade under center, they'd free up about $22 million.7. Kansas City ChiefsProjected salary cap space: $18.9MThe Super Bowl champions aren't hurting for cap space, but if they want to be bold in defending their title, the first thing they can do is get WR to take a pay cut -- or part ways with him altogether. Cutting the veteran target would instantly save the team $14 million in 2020. And, honestly, unle s they're prepared to do something crazy (i.e. stupid) like cutting ' left tackle, , there aren't many other obvious ways for Kansas City to shed big chunks of salary.6. Projected salary cap space: $13.4MThe Bears can finally save money by getting out of TE deal, but the potential 2020 savings aren't substantial enough to warrant cutting ties just yet. Veteran CB could be a candidate for release, however, considering he's due $10 million entering his age-31 season. That's not an unreasonable number for a starting CB these days, but if you're Chicago and wanting to spend big elsewhere, saving all but $1 million of that total by releasing Amukamara isn't a crazy idea. If the Bears want to remake the WR spot or extend with big bucks, they can save a combined $9-plus million by cutting both and .5. Projected salary cap space: $12.3MThe easiest way the Saints could rack up some extra cash for 2020 is by ending their experiment. The team obviously felt strongly enough about the veteran CB to claim him late in 2019, but it would save $11.25 million -- without any dead-cap penalty -- by releasing him and going younger in the secondary. Cutting 32-year-old fellow CB , who's mi sed time in each of the last two seasons, would free up an additional $3.65 million in 2020. LB is also rather replaceable and is fresh off his third career torn ACL, so axing him and saving almost $8 million this year seems like an easy decision.4. Projected salary cap space: $6.1MThe Falcons aren't really in a position to be giving away anyone who can help lead their defense in 2020, but if they're serious about making a splash in free agency, CB could be someone to dangle in a trade, considering his $15.1 million cap hit this year. Otherwise, saying goodbye to battered RB would be a quick way to save some money -- $3.5 million in 2020, to be exact. A few other veteran reserves, from TE ($2.6M) to OT ($3.75M), would also free up space if released this offseason.3. Projected salary cap space: -$1.4M is one of the most established names on the Jags' roster, but he's mi sed 18 games in three years with the team, he'll turn 30 in March, and he's due $22.5 million in 2020, accounting for more of Jacksonville's cap space than all but QB . If the Jags just outright cut him, they'll save all but $2.5 million of that 2020 number. In other words, he's probably a goner, barring a drastic restructure. If you're wondering about Foles, don't wonder too long, because the Jags would actually lose $11.75 million if they were to cut their QB in 2020. WR , on the other hand, also makes sense as a po sible cut victim after another quiet year; he's due $8.75 million this season, and Jacksonville could recoup $5.25 million of that by releasing him.2. Projected salary cap space: -$2.2MThe Steelers could easily ma sage veteran contracts to get under the cap at their current 2020 number, but if they're looking to spend even a decent amount in free agency, they'll probably need to do more than that. LB/S isn't getting any younger or faster, so saving $5.25 million by getting out of his two-year deal seems like a no-brainer. Moving on from LB would appear to be a po sibility as well, considering Pittsburgh could save almost $2 million by cutting ties with him and finding a younger replacement. It's probably more unlikely, but the Steelers could also opt to move on from longtime OG in order to clear his $4 million salary in 2020.1. Minnesota VikingsProjected salary cap space: -$12.3MThe Vikings are literally over the cap entering the offseason, so they're bound to shed salary. The most obvious way they can do that is by cutting ties with former Pro Bowl CB , who's due $12.9 million in 2020 after arguably the worst year of his career. If cut ahead of his age-30 season, Rhodes will save Minnesota $8.1 million -- and a total of $33.7 million over the next three years. The Vikings would also be wise to consider parting ways with pa s rusher , or at least approaching him about a pay cut. The 32-year-old rebounded with eight sacks in 2019 but would save them a whopping $13 million in 2020 if released. He's also due $30 million between 2021-2022. If, for whatever reason, Minnesota is inclined to take the best trade offer for WR , the savings likely wouldn't be as drastic -- perhaps as little as about $5 million in 2020. Jackson Hanna Jersey